Sh2 Bibliography Meaning

THL Toolbox > Essays > Bibliographic Citations

Bibliographic Citations

Contributor(s): José Cabezón, Steven Weinberger, David Germano, Nathaniel Grove, Alison Melnick, Michael Cox.

Overview

This page provides an overview of how to cite references in your essay and how to construct the Bibliography, as well as instructions for basic citations of a journal article and a monograph (book). An extensive list of instructions for other types of resources (article in a journal this is a special named issue; book that has an editor; book that is one volume in a series; and so forth) are found in the Extensive List of Bibliographic References. We suggest you print both that page and the current page for your easy reference.

Every academic essay cites its sources. These citations appear in footnotes/endnotes which specify the source of a quotation or data given in the essay and they appear in a bibliography at the end of the article pointing to sources relevant to the essay’s subject matter. The present page describes how to prepare such bibliographic citations as they occur either in footnotes/endnotes or in a final bibliography. THL/JIATS follows bibliographic documentation according to The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, with a few modifications. One of the best ways to familiarize yourself with this style is to read work that has already been rendered in this style – for example, articles in previous issues of JIATS (see the current issue at http://www.jiats.org/).

All bibliographic citations in the essay must be in the footnotes/endnotes. In the body of the essay itself there is only the note number; the reference is in the note itself, as detailed below. So in the body of the essay/article it reads, for example:

DO NOT use the convention of inserting in the essay itself a short-hand citation after the title of the book, such as

  • …as Kapstein argues (Kapstein 2003: 145).

We ask that you prepare each bibliographical citation in the proper format using THL conventions, which follow the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition. This document contains our standard citation formats for articles and books (for the formatting of a variety of other types of resources, such as an edited volume, see the Extensive List of Bibliographic References). In each case, we specify the way to format it both for a footnote/endnote and for an entry in the Bibliography. The first two sections – on books and journal articles – explain how to format individual parts of a citation (author, title, publisher, and so forth) and those instructions should be understood to apply to all of the other citation formats as well.

The first time a source is cited, provide in a footnote/endnote the full bibliographical citation (publisher, date, and so forth) as detailed below. For all subsequent references to that source, in the footnotes/endnotes use the abbreviated form of the citation as detailed below.

In addition, we ask that you provide a separate Bibliography section which lists in full form all sources that were cited in the footnotes/endnotes, as well as any additional sources you want to include in the Bibliography that were not cited in the footnotes/endnotes. This section should be sorted in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name, as is the standard practice for compiling a bibliography, and it should follow the formatting guidelines detailed below. Please be sure that every source cited in a footnote/endnote is also in the Bibliography.

Please note:

  • Do not italicize text titles, journal titles, and so forth. The italicization will occur after the document has been converted to XML format and it is displayed online.
  • For all article titles cited in your essay, please add quotation marks around the title, since this will not happen automatically during the XML conversion process. Do NOT add quotation marks around article titles in the Glossary Table.
  • In the Bibliography, for all Tibetan, Sanskrit, Mongolian, and Chinese titles, please include your English translation in square brackets [ ] following the title (see details below).
  • We require authors to create entries in the Glossary Table for items in bibliographic citations (author, title, editor, and so forth).

Basic Format for Citations in Notes

At the first instance of a citation in a footnote/endnote, provide the full bibliographical reference.

CITATION OF A JOURNAL ARTICLE

First occurrence in a footnote/endnote:

  • Jacob Dalton, “The Early Development of Padmasambhava Legend in Tibet: A Study of IOL Tib J 644 and Pelliot tibétain 307,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 124, no. 4 (2004): 759.
    • In the body of the essay and in footnotes/endnotes, do not italicize journal titles, text titles, and so forth. They will be italicized online by the web publishing system.
    • For all article titles, please add quotation marks around the title in the essay and the Bibliography.
    • For journal volume and issue numbers, always use arabic numbers; never use roman numerals.

CITATION OF A MONOGRAPH

First occurrence in a footnote/endnote:

  • Per Sørensen, Tibetan Buddhist Historiography: The Mirror Illuminating the Royal Genealogies (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994), 234-43.
    • Do not use the format (Sørensen: 1994, 234-43) or Sørensen (1994): 234-43.

SUBSEQUENT REFERENCES to a Work: for all references to a work after the first reference, the format of the citation in the footnote/endnote is abbreviated: author last name, four- or five-word (or shorter) abbreviated title (do NOT begin the abbreviated title with “A,” “The,” or similar grammatical particles), page number.

  • For Tibetan authors: this does not apply. Always use the full name since they do not have first and last names.
  • For Chinese authors: for the abbreviated name, use the family name (this is the first word in a Chinese name, such as “Mao” in “Mao Zedong”)

Monograph

  • Sørensen, Tibetan Buddhist Historiography, 35.

Article

  • Dalton, “Early Development,” 761.

Please:

  • do NOT use the convention of an abbreviated reference in the body of the essay itself, such as (Dalton: 2004, 761).
  • do NOT use the abbreviations ibid., op. cit., or loc. cit. Always use the abbreviated reference format described immediately above.

Basic Format for the Bibliography

Entries in the Bibliography are arranged alphabetically, by author’s last name. The formatting is different than that of citations in the notes (such as author’s last name, first name; period rather than comma after article title; colon after date for journals; the inclusion of the pagination for the entire article).

  • Journal article: Dalton, Jacob. “The Early Development of Padmasambhava Legend in Tibet: A Study of IOL Tib J 644 and Pelliot tibétain 307.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 124, no. 4 (2004): 734-63.
  • Monograph: Sørensen, Per. Tibetan Buddhist Historiography: The Mirror Illuminating the Royal Genealogies. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994.
  • Tibetan authors do not have a first and last name. So klong chen rab ’byams is alphabetized under the “k”s as klong chen rab ’byams. Do NOT capitalize any letters; the first letter of the first syllable will be capitalized by the stylesheets when the article/essay is displayed online.
  • For Asian titles (Tibetan, Sanskrit, Chinese, Mongolian) add your English translation of the title in square brackets after the title. Example:
    • klong chen rab ’byams. gnas lugs mdzod [The Treasury of Abiding Reality]. sde dge: sde dge par khang, 2003.
  • For all article titles, please add quotation marks around the title. This will not happen automatically when styles are applied.
  • For journal articles: when the page range immediately follows the volume or issue number, there is no space after the colon. Thus, if in the above example there was no year given, it would be:
    • Dalton, Jacob. “The Early Development of Padmasambhava Legend in Tibet: A Study of IOL Tib J 644 and Pelliot tibétain 307.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 124, no. 4:759-72.

Provided for unrestricted use by the Tibetan and Himalayan Library

For "Works Cited" lists, see Citation.

"Bibliology" redirects here. For the theological study of the nature of the Bible, see Biblical theology.

Bibliography (from Greek βιβλίον biblion, "book" and -γραφία -graphia, "writing"), as a discipline, is traditionally the academic study of books as physical, cultural objects; in this sense, it is also known as bibliology[1] (from Greek -λογία, -logia). Carter and Barker (2010) describe bibliography as a twofold scholarly discipline—the organized listing of books (enumerative bibliography) and the systematic description of books as physical objects (descriptive bibliography).

Etymology[edit]

The word bibliographia (βιβλιογραφία) was used by Greek writers in the first three centuries AD to mean the copying of books by hand. In the 12th century, the word started being used for "the intellectual activity of composing books". The 17th century then saw the emergence of the modern meaning, that of description of books.[2] Currently, the field of bibliography has expanded to include studies that consider the book as a material object.[3] Bibliography in its systematic pursuit of understanding the past and the present through written and printed documents describes a way and means of extracting information from this material. Bibliographers are interested in comparing versions of texts to each other rather than in interpreting their meaning or assessing their significance. [4]

Bibliography as a field of study[edit]

Bibliography is a specialized aspect of library science (or library and information science, LIS) and documentation science. The founder of documentation, Paul Otlet, wrote about "the science of bibliography".[5][6] However, there have recently been voices claiming that "the bibliographical paradigm" is obsolete, and it is not today common in LIS. A defense of the bibliographical paradigm was provided by Hjørland (2007).[7] The quantitative study of bibliographies is known as bibliometrics, which is today an influential subfield in LIS. [8][9]

Branches of bibliography[edit]

Carter and Barker (2010) describe bibliography as a twofold scholarly discipline—the organized listing of books (enumerative bibliography) and the systematic description of books as physical objects (descriptive bibliography). These two distinct concepts and practices have separate rationales and serve differing purposes. Innovators and originators in the field include W. W. Greg, Fredson Bowers, Philip Gaskell, G. Thomas Tanselle.

Bowers (1949) refers to enumerative bibliography as a procedure that identifies books in “specific collections or libraries,” in a specific discipline, by an author, printer, or period of production (3). He refers to descriptive bibliography as the systematic description of a book as a material or physical artifact. Analytical bibliography, the cornerstone of descriptive bibliography, investigates the printing and all physical features of a book that yield evidence establishing a book's history and transmission (Feather 10). It is the preliminary phase of bibliographic description and provides the vocabulary, principles and techniques of analysis that descriptive bibliographers apply and on which they base their descriptive practice.

Descriptive bibliographers follow specific conventions and associated classification in their description. Titles and title pages are transcribed in a quasi-facsimile style and representation. Illustration, typeface, binding, paper, and all physical elements related to identifying a book follow formulaic conventions, as Bower's established in his foundational opus, The Principles of Bibliographic Description. The thought expressed in this book expands substantively on W. W. Greg's groundbreaking theory that argued for the adoption of formal bibliographic principles (Greg 29). Fundamentally, analytical bibliography is concerned with objective, physical analysis and history of a book while descriptive bibliography employs all data that analytical bibliography furnishes and then codifies it with a view to identifying the ideal copy or form of a book that most nearly represents the printer’s initial conception and intention in printing.

In addition to viewing bibliographic study as being composed of four interdependent approaches (enumerative, descriptive, analytical, and textual), Bowers notes two further subcategories of research, namely historical bibliography and aesthetic bibliography.[10] Both historical bibliography, which involves the investigation of printing practices, tools, and related documents, and aesthetic bibliography, which examines the art of designing type and books, are often employed by analytical bibliographers.

D. F. McKenzie extended previous notions of bibliography as set forth by W. W. Greg, Bowers, Gaskell and Tanselle. He describes the nature of bibliography as "the discipline that studies texts as recorded forms, and the processes of their transmission, including their production and reception" (1999 12). This concept broadens the scope of bibliography to include "non-book texts" and an accounting for their material form and structure, as well as textual variations, technical and production processes that bring sociocultural context and effects into play. McKenzie's perspective contextualizes textual objects or artifacts with sociological and technical factors that have an effect on production, transmission and, ultimately, ideal copy (2002 14). Bibliography, generally, concerns the material conditions of books [as well as other texts] how they are designed, edited, printed, circulated, reprinted, collected.[11]

Bibliographic works differ in the amount of detail depending on the purpose and can generally be divided into two categories: enumerative bibliography (also called compilative, reference or systematic), which results in an overview of publications in a particular category and analytical or critical bibliography, which studies the production of books.[12][13] In earlier times, bibliography mostly focused on books. Now, both categories of bibliography cover works in other media including audio recordings, motion pictures and videos, graphic objects, databases, CD-ROMs[14] and websites.

Enumerative bibliography[edit]

An enumerative bibliography is a systematic list of books and other works such as journalarticles. Bibliographies range from "works cited" lists at the end of books and articles, to complete and independent publications. A notable example of a complete, independent publication is Gow's, A. E. Housman: A Sketch, Together with a List of His Classical Papers (1936). As separate works, they may be in bound volumes such as those shown on the right, or computerized bibliographic databases. A library catalog, while not referred to as a "bibliography," is bibliographic in nature. Bibliographical works are almost always considered to be tertiary sources.

Enumerative bibliographies are based on a unifying principle such as creator, subject, date, topic or other characteristic. An entry in an enumerative bibliography provides the core elements of a text resource including a title, the creator(s), publication date and place of publication. Belanger (1977) distinguishes an enumerative bibliography from other bibliographic forms such as descriptive bibliography, analytical bibliography or textual bibliography in that its function is to record and list, rather than describe a source in detail or with any reference to the source's physical nature, materiality or textual transmission. The enumerative list may be comprehensive or selective. One noted example would be Tanselle's bibliography that exhaustively enumerates topics and sources related to all forms of bibliography. A more common and particular instance of an enumerative bibliography relates to specific sources used or considered in preparing a scholarly paper or academic term paper.

Citation styles vary.

An entry for a book in a bibliography usually contains the following elements:

  • creator(s)
  • title
  • place of publication
  • publisher or printer
  • date of publication

An entry for a journal or periodical article usually contains:

  • creator(s)
  • article title
  • journal title
  • volume
  • pages
  • date of publication

A bibliography may be arranged by author, topic, or some other scheme. Annotated bibliographies give descriptions about how each source is useful to an author in constructing a paper or argument. These descriptions, usually a few sentences long, provide a summary of the source and describe its relevance. Reference management software may be used to keep track of references and generate bibliographies as required.

Bibliographies differ from library catalogs by including only relevant items rather than all items present in a particular library. However, the catalogs of some national libraries effectively serve as national bibliographies (de), as the national libraries own almost all their countries' publications.[15][16]

Descriptive bibliography[edit]

Fredson Bowers described and formulated a standardized practice of descriptive bibliography in his Principles of Bibliographical Description (1949). Scholars to this day treat Bowers' scholarly guide as authoritative. In this classic text, Bowers describes the basic function of bibliography as, "[providing] sufficient data so that a reader may identify the book described, understand the printing, and recognize the precise contents" (124).

Descriptive bibliographies as scholarly product[edit]

Descriptive bibliographies as a scholarly product usually include information on the following aspect of a given book as a material object:

  • Format and Collation/Pagination Statement – a conventional, symbolic formula that describes the book block in terms of sheets, folds, quires, signatures, and pages
According to Bowers (193), the format of a book is usually abbreviated in the collation formula:
Broadsheet: I° or b.s. or bs.
Folio: 2° or fol.
Quarto: 4° or 4to or Q° or Q
Octavo: 8° or 8vo
Duodecimo: 12° or 12mo
Sexto-decimo: 16° or 16mo
Tricesimo-secundo: 32° or 32mo
Sexagesimo-quarto: 64° or 64mo
The collation, which follows the format, is the statement of the order and size of the gatherings.
For example, a quarto that consists of the signed gatherings:
2 leaves signed A, 4 leaves signed B, 4 leaves signed C, and 2 leaves signed D
would be represented in the collation formula:
4°: A2B-C4D2
  • Binding – a description of the binding techniques (generally for books printed after 1800)
  • Title Page Transcription – a transcription of the title page, including rule lines and ornaments
  • Contents – a listing of the contents (by section) in the book
  • Paper – a description of the physical properties of the paper, including production process, an account of chain-line measurements, and a description of watermarks (if present)
  • Illustrations – a description of the illustrations found in the book, including printing process (e.g. woodblock, intaglio, etc.), measurements, and locations in the text
  • Presswork – miscellaneous details gleaned from the text about its production
  • Copies Examined – an enumeration of the copies examined, including those copies' location (i.e. belonging to which library or collector)

Analytical bibliography[edit]

This branch of the bibliographic discipline examines the material features of a textual artifact – such as type, ink, paper, imposition, format, impressions and states of a book – to essentially recreate the conditions of its production. Analytical bibliography often uses collateral evidence – such as general printing practices, trends in format, responses and non-responses to design, etc. – to scrutinize the historical conventions and influences underlying the physical appearance of a text. The bibliographer utilizes knowledge gained from the investigation of physical evidence in the form of a descriptive bibliography or textual bibliography.[17] Descriptive bibliography is the close examination and cataloging of a text as a physical object, recording its size, format, binding, and so on, while textual bibliography (or textual criticism) identifies variations – and the aetiology of variations – in a text with a view to determining "the establishment of the most correct form of [a] text (Bowers 498[1]).

Bibliographers[edit]

A bibliographer is a person who describes and lists books and other publications, with particular attention to such characteristics as authorship, publication date, edition, typography, etc. A person who limits such efforts to a specific field or discipline is a subject bibliographer."[18]

A bibliographer, in the technical meaning of the word, is anyone who writes about books. But the accepted meaning since at least the 18th century is a person who attempts a comprehensive account—sometimes just a list, sometimes a fuller reckoning—of the books written on a particular subject. In the present, bibliography is no longer a career, generally speaking; bibliographies tend to be written on highly specific subjects and by specialists in the field.

The term bibliographer is sometimes—in particular subject bibliographer—today used about certain roles performed in libraries[19] and bibliographic databases.

Non-book material[edit]

Systematic lists of media other than books can be referred to with terms formed analogously to bibliography:

Arachniography is a term coined by NASA research historian Andrew J. Butrica, which means a reference list of URLs about a particular subject. It is equivalent to a bibliography in a book. The name derives from arachne in reference to a spider and its web.[20][21]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^"bibliology". The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). 1989. 
  2. ^Blum, Rudolf. Bibliographia, an inquiry into its definition and designations. Translated by Mathilde V. Rovelstad. Chicago, Ill.: American Library Association; Folkestone, Kent, England: Dawson, 1980. p. 12. ISBN 0-8389-0146-8.
  3. ^Studies in Bibliography. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/
  4. ^O'Hagan Hardy, M. (2017). Bibliographic enterprise and the digital age: Charles Evans and the making of early American literature. American Literary History, 29(2), 331-351.
  5. ^Otlet, P. (1903). Les sciences bibliographiques et la documentation. Bruxelles, Institut international de bibliographie.
  6. ^Otlet, P. (1903). "The science of bibliography and documentation"2. In Rayward, W.B. (trans. and ed.), (1990), International organisation and dissemination of knowledge: Selected essays of Paul Otlet. FID, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  7. ^Hjørland, B. (2007). "Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm'. Some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC", Information Research, 12(4) paper colis06. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis06.html]
  8. ^McKenzie, D. F. (1999). Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
  9. ^Gow, A. S. F. A. E. Housman: A Sketch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print
  10. ^Fredson Bowers, "Four Faces of Bibliography" Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 10 (1971):33-4.
  11. ^Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (2000).
  12. ^Belanger, Terry. "Descriptive Bibliography" Bibliographical Society of America, 2003. Excerpted from Jean Peters, ed., Book Collecting: A Modern Guide (New York and London: R. R. Bowker, 1977), 97–101.
  13. ^Harris, Neil. Analytical bibliography: an alternative prospectus. Chapter 1. Definitions of bibliography, and in particular of the variety called analyticalArchived 2007-10-12 at the Wayback Machine.. Institut d'histoire du livre, 2004.
  14. ^Harmon, Robert B. Elements of bibliography: a simplified approach. Rev. ed. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1989. p. 4. ISBN 0-8108-2218-0.
  15. ^"National Bibliographic Register". Ifla.org. The Hague: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Retrieved 1 December 2017. 
  16. ^"National bibliographies and books in print". Help for researchers. British Library. Retrieved 1 December 2017. 
  17. ^Bowers, Fredson (1974). Bibliography (2nd ed.). pp. 978–981. 
  18. ^Reitz, Joan M. (2010). "Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science". abc-clio.com. 
  19. ^"MLA Field Bibliographers". mla.org. Retrieved 2013-10-08. 
  20. ^Staff (2007). Encyclopedia Of Information Technology. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. p. 28. ISBN 81-269-0752-5. 
  21. ^McKenzie, D. F. (2002). Making Meaning: Printers of the Mind and Other Essays. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Blum, Rudolf. (1980) Bibliographia. An Inquiry in Its Definition and Designations, Dawson, American Library Association.
  • Bowers, Fredson. (1995) Principles of Bibliographical Description, Oak Knoll Press.
  • Duncan, Paul Shaner. (1973) How to Catalog a Rare Book, 2nd ed., rev., American Library Association.
  • John Carter; Nicolas Barker (2004). "Bibliography". ABC for Book Collectors (8th ed.). Oak Knoll Press and British Library. ISBN 1-58456-112-2. 
  • Gaskell, Philip. (2000) A New Introduction to Bibliography, Oak Knoll Press.
  • McKerrow, R. B. (1927) An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Schneider, Georg. (1934) Theory and History of Bibliography, New York: Scarecrow Press.
  • National Library of Canada, Committee on Bibliography and Information Services for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Guidelines for the Compilation of a Bibliography (National Library of Canada, 1987). N.B.: This is a brief guide to accurately practical bibliography, not a study concerning more precise and systematic bibliography.
  • British Museum. Department of Printed Books (1881). Hand List of Bibliographies, Classified Catalogues, and Indexes Placed in the Reading Room of the British Museum for Reference. London: Printed by William Clowes and Sons. 
  • Robinson, A. M. Lewin (1966) Systematic Bibliography; rev. ed. London: Clive Bingley

External links[edit]

Bibliographer workplace in Russia

0 thoughts on “Sh2 Bibliography Meaning”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *